Business case · Executive summary

The First Year Does Not Pay for Itself

A Finance-Ready Business Case for Municipal GIS

The First Year Does Not Pay for Itself report cover

Asset Mapping Evidence Standard

  • AI-assisted research
  • Sources verified
  • Claims checked
  • Evidence critically assessed
  • Conclusions evidence-rated

Executive summary

Return on investment compares the monetized value of what a system produces against the cost of everything fed into it. It is a legitimate discipline — and a narrow one. Three specific distortions apply when it is pointed at a twelve-month GIS pilot.

Data conversion, metadata, workflow redesign and training are consumed in year one and paid back over many. Charging the full conversion cost against twelve months of partial adoption guarantees a negative result no matter how sound the project is. This report builds a finance-ready business case for municipal GIS: what it costs, what it returns, why a negative year-one ROI can still be rational, and how to present the investment to a finance department on its own terms.

Contents

  1. 01The problem: what a first-year ROI test actually measures
  2. 02The numbers: what it costs and what it returns
  3. 03Why a negative year-one ROI can still be rational
  4. 04Where GIS value actually comes from
  5. 05The GIS Investment Test
  6. 06Recommendation
  7. 07Build the case for your municipality
  8. 08Research & Methodology
  9. 09Method, scope, and assumptions
  10. 10Scenario analysis
  11. 11Volume test: does the demand actually exist?
  12. 12Implementation sequence
  13. 13Risks and failure modes
  14. 14Annotated bibliography
  15. 15Note on evidence quality